July 30th, 2008
The art of conversating
See, the way humans acquire language is this: The baby/toddler listens to people talk to him, notices some particular feature of human speech, then cutes up the house practicing that feature.
1. They listen and hear people saying “Blah blah blah” — so they babble.
2. Once they get that down, they listen and notice that language has intonation and particular sounds to it - so the baby starts babbling in fake English or Portuguese or what have you.
3. Oh, wow! Some words mean things. That could be useful! So they practice learning nouns and ignore the rest.
4. Then they notice oh shit, wait — there’s a whole grammar going on here. And they spend the next two years practicing the many ridiculously complicated and annoying rules of their language’s basic grammar. Where verbs go, how to make thing possessive or plural, how to properly tell someone to step the hell off of your foam blocks, etc.
5. Once they have that down, they start tuning in to the nuances of conversation. Turn taking is the most obvious feature, so they practice that for awhile before noticing that conversations are supposed to run along a single topic. Aha! What we’re doing here — maybe the point of everything back to the babbling — is talking about something. So they have to practice listening to a conversation, identifying the topic at hand, and joining in with their own relevant comments.
Graham has entered phase 5. It’s awesome. If everyone is talking about something that happened long ago, he scans his brain for something that will fit in the conversation. It can be anything, as long as it sounds sort of related. I just hope he outgrows it before adulthood…
ADULT #1: I thought the pacing of the movie was odd. It made it feel like the audience is peering in on someone’s life. I wonder if that was a deliberate choice?
ADULT #2: I don’t know, but it felt slow to me. Maybe that’s why.
ADULT # 1: Or maybe they just didn’t edit it very well, so the whole thing ended up sort of plodding along.
ADULT #2: Right - well the movie was good, but definitely odd.
ADULT # 3: I saw a movie about a ROBOT!
Which is a much more interesting turn in the conversation really, but some people aren’t that open minded.
On Sunday, we were up in the mountains of South Carolina. Nicolaus and Graham were sitting with their cousin Gavin, all in tiny plastic chairs, under/inside a low, wide, squatting sort of tree. I don’t know what kind of tree it was, but its branches made a perfect little house for kids. They sat in there and talked about bad guys and theoretical physics and other topics of interest to children.
They heard thunder in the distance. Gavin, the oldest, looked up through the branches. “Was that thunder? Maybe we should get out from under this tree so we don’t get killed.”
“Why would we get killed?”
“Because! Lightening could strike the tree and boom, kill us.”
Nicolaus thought about that for a second. “No,” He said, “I don’t think it would kill us. Because wood doesn’t conduct electricity really very much. So if lightening hit the top of the tree, it couldn’t really travel all the way down here to kill us.”
“Oh. But! What IF that storm turns out to be a tornado? That could kill us for sure.”
“Yeah. Or a hurricane! We could be blown away or even flooded right out of here. And you might not think so, but floods can kill us because we aren’t, we aren’t wearing life jackets.”
“Oh yeah. A hurricane would definitely kill us.”
Graham, having analyzed the topic at hand and identified it as a serious and important one, joined in with a helpful offer: “If I had a knife. If I had a pocket knife? I could kill y’all.”
I want to hug him all day long.
July 30th, 2008 at 8:08 am
Heh, my parents actually just called from Portugal and announced they had identified my daughter’s native language.
July 30th, 2008 at 9:20 am
As if there were any question, but he totally is the spawn of Kevin…
July 30th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Heh. In the middle of a tiresome conversation, I often think what Graham said, but I didn’t know we were allowed to say it aloud. Cool. ; )
July 30th, 2008 at 9:46 am
This is hilarious! My 3-year-old daughter an Graham would get along well, metinks.
July 30th, 2008 at 9:47 am
Or, uh, metHinks. Look at me trying to be all cool and English-nerdy…
July 30th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Graham is awesome. And I agree with Jill W., I usually want to say that in the middle of a lot of conversations. Too bad I no longer have the free pass of being a toddler. Damn!!!
July 30th, 2008 at 6:42 pm
Graham always cracks me up. I know people who blurt out things that they think are relevant to conversations, and they’re way older than 2.
And, as a former southerner, I love the use of y’all.
July 30th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
LOL! Graham is hilarious! I especially love the “y’all”. Very nice.
July 30th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
Thunder is nature’s way of telling y-all that ya didn’t get struck by the lightning. My dad told me this when I was about three so Ive been scared of trains ever since. Or something.
Nicolaus should understand that the awesome amount of power in lightning can be conducted by about anything. Especially trees and things under them. Is there a way we can tell him that without fahreeeking him out? It would be uncool if he developed a train aversion.
July 30th, 2008 at 11:51 pm
He likes Important Safety Tips these days… it gives him a platform of authority that he can use to lecture others. So that explanation might go over well actually. Or! We could just offer to stab him?
July 31st, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Thank you for the best laugh I’ve had all day :D
July 31st, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Aha ha ha ha ha!
Oh what a chuckle before bedtime!