… mom!
No wait. She’s disqualified. Because of all the times she made me babysit my little brother when I had more important things to do like sit on the lawn and bitch to my friends about how unfair my parents were for making me babysit all those times when I had more important things to do.
The actual winner is el. Whose entry made me actually laugh out loud and whose blog you should check out, because even if you aren’t religious and so don’t understand like 40% of what she’s referring to, she’s a hell of a writer and I’m thinking a pretty darn cool lady.
This was the giveaway for the week before last. The giveaway for last week, the week of Christmas, will begin on Monday of next week. You followed that? After that, no more! I’m excited about this one because the thing I am giving away is very special – there are only 20 of them in the whole world, so it’s made of metaphorical gold. Either gold or a solid vomitous mass of partially consumed dog poop, depending on what happens with the new CPSIA regulations.
How was that for a segue? Did I do alright?
A new law aimed at manufacturers, CPSIA stands for Child Protection Safety Holy Living Shit Mother of Lord We Are All Going To Be Voted Out Of Office If We Don’t Get Toy Safety Issues Under Control Improvement Act. It’s the kind legislation that includes a lot of things that people like me dislike. Things like passive voice and poor font choice, and an appalling lack of whitespace. There’s a lot of serious panic over the CPSIA and what it means for people who sell children’s products, and I’ve had a few people ask me what I think about it all.
When I first heard and read about the CPSIA, I said: yay. Good. Yes. It puts intense restrictions on children’s products sold in the U.S.
I’m a mother. I hate unsafe toys. I already have to get over the guilt of driving to and stepping foot in Target, spending money we don’t have on things we don’t need that create clutter and mess we don’t want. Then I have to set aside the neurotic worry that our children are over-indulged and somehow damaged by the purchase of random bullshit. But at least the toys are fun and really in moderation, what’s the harm?
When it turns out that the harm is things like seizures, brain damage, and consumption of coma-inducing date rape drugs – well, you can see where I’d be mad. As a mom. So yeah.
Making baby toys out of poison, many parents agree, is bad. Bad enough that people who do it should go to jail and pay big fines and never sell consumer products in this country again.
And hey! Good news! That’s the exact gist of this new law: Anyone who sells anything that’s going to be touched by anyone under the age of twelve must have each product fully certified, with testing from an approved labratory proving that each component of the product is free of grody scary shit. Failure to comply = fines the size of your mom and jail time.
Well. Guess what! The new law also applies to small companies and individual artisans. Total panic over at etsy. But honestly, though it was unpopular to say so, the law still sounded like a good idea to me. Crafty people can buy a bunch of things from Michael’s that were all made in China out of leftover pesticides and then glue them all together into a baby teether. Wouldn’t hurt to test it for lead, you know? And even though my Nerdy Baby flashcards are made here in my own town using inks that are made onsite, I DO want to make sure they are safe for babies to eat.
But the more I learn about the law, the more I understand why people are freaking out. Here are the biggest problems that I see:
1. The testing required is redundant many times over.
For example, my ABC flashcards and the 123 ones were made as part of the same print run. Then we divided them up, shrinkwrapped them into separate products. Under this law, I have to pay for double lab testing. Each ink color must be tested, so that’s four x two tests at roughly $100 per test. The same goes for all of my prints and posters. I’ll do it, but it seems redundant and weird, doesn’t it?
If you buy yarn and knit a bunch of baby sweaters to sell at a craft show, you need to have one tested. If you make matching socks, those also need to be tested even though they came from the same blob of yarn.
2. One of a kind pieces will become almost out of reach.
When someone commissions me to do an original drawing, the price is usually $80. Under the new law, if the subject matter would even possibly appeal to children, it’s a children’s product. That means I need to have each individual color of paint, pencil or ink tested for each new painting that I sell. So an $80 painting will now cost close to $800.
Or I can scan it and make a print of it, and bring the cost down to $480 because there’s only four colors of ink in there.
3. And that is all true even if all of the materials I’m using are already certified as safe for children.
The inks I use for most of my artwork are made by Derwent, a British company that complies with the strictest safety standards in the world. I have seen a copy of their product certification, and I would have no problem feeding my ink pencils to my own child if art supplies weren’t so expensive.
Same for people who raise their own sheep, shear the wool, spin it into yarn, and make things out of it. Those end products must be tested to make sure they don’t contain lead paint. Seriously.
4. The law is insanely broad and far-reaching.
Even products that children are unlikely to ever touch are affected. I have to certify a decorative art print before I can sell it, even though the parent is going to take it home and display it in a frame made out of solid lead.
Also, ANYthing that a kid is likely to play with counts. Not just toys. If it looks the least bit cute or bright or appealing to children, it must be tested. In my house that means that scrap paper from Office Max, miniature staplers, turkey basters and other kitchen utensils all should be certified.
And my goodness – think of the number of objects in a school classroom. Staples, paper, pencils, wall decor… All of those are about to become a lot more expensive. Not because the manufacturers have to switch to safer ways of making them, but because the burden of proof/testing is so expensive.
5. The law contains a lot of ambiguous language, and we’re having a hard time getting any clarification.
So small businesses with limited resources are scrambling to comply with this law in time for the Feb 10 deadline — but we still don’t know exactly what we are supposed to do.
6. The law affects you, even if you aren’t a small toy manufacturer.
- If you donate toys or clothes to charity or sell them on ebay, you’d better make sure all of them are certified. If you knit socks and give them to the local children’s shelter, that’s your ass unless you have them tested. Fabulous Julie giving away her amazing quilts? About to be illegal even if she grows the cotton herself and makes all of the fabric and thread on her very own loom, which I assume she does.
- If you shop for children’s products – including jewelry, clothes, art, toys, art supplies, anything – prepare for prices on those things to go up a bit. The more components a product has, the more expensive it’ll be. Look at a shoe and count up the number of different materials you can touch. Of course, if you’re selling 20,000 pairs of those shoes the expense of certification might not be terrible… but it’s a rough time for anything to become more expensive, ya know? Then again, as a mom I’m okay with this. A small fee to make sure my kids aren’t ingesting poison? Ehh… nevermind this one. Suck it up, consumers. Said in a loving way.
- You’re also likely to have fewer choices. Consignment and resale shops – including ones on ebay – may have to shut down, and a lot of smaller toy manufacturers are throwing up their hands and shutting down, or at least giving up selling in the United States. Not because they want to produce unsafe toys – but again, because the burden of proof is not only expensive but so complex that it’s easy to mess up and become a felon despite your best efforts to follow the law.
So! that’s what I think. I think it’s a good law that needs to be clearer and less redundant. Manufacturers who buy parts from other vendors should be able to use the certifications that those vendors provide. If you make a dress out of certified fabric using certified thread and certified zippers and buttons, why re-test every one of those things once they’ve been assembled into a dress?
My plan is to stay in business and do my best. My flashcards are already at the lab for testing, and my prints and posters will go next. Unless the law is ammended, I’m no longer going to offer one of a kind things like mobiles and drawings. This also changes my plans for complex products with multiple components like Nerdy Baby toys, mobiles, craft kits, and gift sets. I’m bummed because those things were going to sort of rock, but you never know. I’m hoping hoping hoping that enough people will appeal to lawmakers to change and clarify this law.
And if that doesn’t work, we’re going to move into a three bedroom apartment and use the extra room to start a lead-testing lab. Woooo!